<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-2"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luke Szkudlarek &#187; Future of Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/category/future-of-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog</link>
	<description>Digital Marketing, Web Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who said it first according to Google</title>
		<link>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2010/06/21/who-said-it-first-according-to-google/</link>
		<comments>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2010/06/21/who-said-it-first-according-to-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gerd Leonhard delivered a wonderful presentation at the future of digital marketing in London last week. In his presentation Gerd used the quote &#8220;data is the new oil of the Internet&#8221;. He wasn&#8217;t sure who the author was but thought the quote was a powerful statement, particularly in relation to the social networking &#038; sharing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediafuturist.com/about.html">Gerd Leonhard</a> delivered a wonderful presentation at <a href="http://econsultancy.com/events/future-of-digital-marketing">the future of digital marketing in London </a>last week.  In his presentation Gerd used the quote <strong>&#8220;data is the new oil of the Internet&#8221;</strong>. He wasn&#8217;t sure who the author was but thought the quote was a powerful statement, particularly in relation to the social networking &#038; sharing information online.  </p>
<p><strong>So who said it first? </strong></p>
<p>New search features released by Google in May 2010 enable you to narrow down search results by time and keywords.  Now in couple minutes you can find the original author &#8211; of course with an assumption that all content is indexed by Google!  </p>
<p>If you use standard search queries you will probably find that it was Gerd Leonhard. In order to find the first result I had to use a combination of phrase match, negative terms, change the sort order and specify date range.  The search phrase does almost look like a piece of code. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the final Google query<em> &#8220;data is the new oil&#8221; -site:www.mediafuturist.com -@garyr0binson -leonhard -gleonhard<br />
</em></p>
<p><a href="http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/wp-content/data-is-new-oil-search-quote-e1277155757712.jpg"><img src="http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/wp-content/data-is-new-oil-search-quote-e1277155757712.jpg" alt="" title="data-is-new-oil-search-quote" width="500" height="468" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-71" /></a></p>
<p>You will see the first result is linking to the <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/09/156&#038;format=DOC&#038;aged=0&#038;language=EN&#038;guiLanguage=en">speech delivered by Meglena Kuneva</a> (EU Consumer Affairs Commissioner) in Brussels on 31st March 2009.  Ms Kuneva said &#8220;Personal data is the new oil of the Internet and the new currency of the digital world&#8221; .   If you trust Google she is creator &#038; original author of this powerful quote. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2010/06/21/who-said-it-first-according-to-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolfram&#124;Alpha vs. Google comparison</title>
		<link>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2009/05/17/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2009/05/17/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2009/05/17/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading Ericks&#8217; article and comments on how Google will crush Wolfram&#124;Alpha I thought it would be good to summmarise the discussion as there seem to be a lot of confusion what Wolfram&#124;Alpha is/isn&#8217;t. See the differences in the table below and feel free to adda comment if you think I missed anything. At the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading  <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/12/what-is-google-squared-it-is-how-google-will-crush-wolfram-alpha-exclusive-video/">Ericks&#8217; article</a> and comments on how Google will crush Wolfram|Alpha I thought it would be good to summmarise the discussion as there seem to be a lot of confusion what Wolfram|Alpha is/isn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>See the differences in the table below and feel free to adda comment if you think I missed anything. </p>
<p>At the same time I have to say I&#8217;m very excited about the Wolfram|Alpha project and I wish it had been available few years ago when I was still at the uni. </p>
<table width="500">
<tr>
<th>Title</th>
<th><img src='http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/wp-content/google-logo-2.thumbnail.jpg' alt='google logo' /></th>
<th><img src='http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/wp-content/wolfram-logo.thumbnail.JPG' alt='wolfram|alpha logo' /></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Search Engine</td>
<td>Yes &#8211; google is indexing the web and returning list of pages</td>
<td>No &#8211; it generates output by doing computations from its own internal knowledge base</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Free</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Yes, free for personal noncommercial use</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Audience</td>
<td>Mainstream audience, thanks to its simplicity</td>
<td>Everyone, but given its complexity and it will attract mainly academic audience</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Link with information source</td>
<td>connects users with information source</td>
<td>connects users with information</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Database updates</td>
<td>real-time dependent on the indexing frequency</td>
<td>potentially real-time subject to manual data input and approval</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Typical queries</td>
<td>general interest, shopping</td>
<td>scientific, academic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Business model</td>
<td>Mainly Pay Per Click contextual ads</td>
<td>Paid subscriptions with enhanced features for large-scale and commercial use and business partnerships</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fundations</td>
<td>1995: Based on a search engine called BackRub, BackRub operated on Stanford servers from 1995</td>
<td>1988: Wolfram|Alpha is built on the Wolfram Mathematica system, which has been in continual development since 1988</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Languages</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>English only</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Limitations</td>
<td>authority based on PageRank, lack of common data structure</td>
<td>Wolfram|Alpha can only know things that are known, and are somehow public. It only deals with facts, not opinions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Key strenghts</td>
<td>Simplicity and a wide range of knowledge/data</td>
<td>computation and mathematics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data checks</td>
<td>Mainly automated and managed by Google spam team. But, given its mainstream audience highly affected by spam</td>
<td>Automated and manual, including exper review.  Less likely to be targeted by spammers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data upload</td>
<td>No &#8211; data needs to be published on the web</td>
<td>Yes &#8211; submission process sumilar to wikipedia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Private personal information</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>No. It contains only information that is considered public. </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adult content</td>
<td>Yes, particularly when SafeSearch Filtering is off</td>
<td>No. It has no adult images or narrative. It gives only factual answers to factual questions.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
Many similarities but they are two completely different tools &#8211; targeting different audience.  <Br><br />
I think Wolfram|Alpha has its right to exist as a niche and reliable tool for research and I&#8217;m sure there are businesses who will pay for additional features. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2009/05/17/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Semantic Web (Web 3.0) Lead to Perfect Competition?</title>
		<link>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2007/07/12/will-the-semantic-web-web-30-lead-to-perfect-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2007/07/12/will-the-semantic-web-web-30-lead-to-perfect-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2007/07/12/will-the-semantic-web-web-30-lead-to-perfect-competition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First thoughts about Internet becoming Perfect Competition market appeared in 2000. Will the Internet Lead to Perfect Competition?. The article highlihgts two main barriers to the Perfect Competition market structure. These are price discrimination and marketing costs of market entry. With more advanced Web the remaining requirements are likely to be fulfilled and this includes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thoughts about Internet becoming Perfect Competition market appeared in 2000. <a href="http://www.sbe.co.uk/pdfs/articles/32_2_Swann.pdf">Will the Internet Lead to Perfect Competition?</a>. The article highlihgts two main barriers to the Perfect Competition market structure. These are price discrimination and marketing costs of market entry. With more advanced Web the remaining requirements are likely to be fulfilled and this includes atomicity (a large number of small producers and consumers on a given market), homogeneity (there is no product differentiation), perfect and complete information (All firms and consumers know the prices set by all firms), equal access to production technologies  and individual buyers and sellers act independently. </p>
<p>Price discrimination exists when identical products are transacted at different prices from the same seller. In terms of Internet, it means that people who have more time to do research have more chances of finding a better deal, i.e. are able to buy a product or a service at lower price. The article also says that barriers to entry still exist as the marketing costs might be at very high level.  This is mainly related to the fact that not every company can affort to spend money on Pay Per Click advertising or Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) services. This proves that both arguments are relevant in World Wide Web, however, they do not necessarily apply to the Semantic Web project.</p>
<p>The Tanya Gupta and Abir Qasem in their article <a href="http://semanticweb2002.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/proceedings/Position/gupta.pdf">&#8220;Reduction of price dispersion through Semantic E-commerce: A Position Paper&#8221;</a> proves that information assymentry in Semanic Web won&#8217;t exist and the price discrimination will be highly reduced. How about barriers to entry? In today&#8217;s web, where most of the websites traffic comes from search engines, we can distinguish between organic/natural search results and paid search (Pay Per Click) results. However, even in the Semantic Web perfect information market there will be companies eager to pay to advertise new products or services. Would this advertising and marketing activities create any additional revenue? If all potential customers already have a full access to the information they need to make rational buying decision spending money on paid ads won&#8217;t be effective from economical point of view. However, if Semantic Web doesn&#8217;t offer real-time enviroment paid ads might still prove to be effective and profitable in short term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://luke.szkudlarek.pl/blog/2007/07/12/will-the-semantic-web-web-30-lead-to-perfect-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
