{"id":59,"date":"2009-05-17T18:16:05","date_gmt":"2009-05-17T17:16:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/2009\/05\/17\/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison\/"},"modified":"2009-05-17T18:35:31","modified_gmt":"2009-05-17T17:35:31","slug":"wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/2009\/05\/17\/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Wolfram|Alpha vs. Google comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After reading  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2009\/05\/12\/what-is-google-squared-it-is-how-google-will-crush-wolfram-alpha-exclusive-video\/\">Ericks&#8217; article<\/a> and comments on how Google will crush Wolfram|Alpha I thought it would be good to summmarise the discussion as there seem to be a lot of confusion what Wolfram|Alpha is\/isn&#8217;t. <\/p>\n<p>See the differences in the table below and feel free to adda comment if you think I missed anything. <\/p>\n<p>At the same time I have to say I&#8217;m very excited about the Wolfram|Alpha project and I wish it had been available few years ago when I was still at the uni. <\/p>\n<table width=\"500\">\n<tr>\n<th>Title<\/th>\n<th><img src='http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-content\/google-logo-2.thumbnail.jpg' alt='google logo' \/><\/th>\n<th><img src='http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-content\/wolfram-logo.thumbnail.JPG' alt='wolfram|alpha logo' \/><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Search Engine<\/td>\n<td>Yes &#8211; google is indexing the web and returning list of pages<\/td>\n<td>No &#8211; it generates output by doing computations from its own internal knowledge base<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Free<\/td>\n<td>Yes<\/td>\n<td>Yes, free for personal noncommercial use<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Audience<\/td>\n<td>Mainstream audience, thanks to its simplicity<\/td>\n<td>Everyone, but given its complexity and it will attract mainly academic audience<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Link with information source<\/td>\n<td>connects users with information source<\/td>\n<td>connects users with information<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Database updates<\/td>\n<td>real-time dependent on the indexing frequency<\/td>\n<td>potentially real-time subject to manual data input and approval<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Typical queries<\/td>\n<td>general interest, shopping<\/td>\n<td>scientific, academic<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Business model<\/td>\n<td>Mainly Pay Per Click contextual ads<\/td>\n<td>Paid subscriptions with enhanced features for large-scale and commercial use and business partnerships<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fundations<\/td>\n<td>1995: Based on a search engine called BackRub, BackRub operated on Stanford servers from 1995<\/td>\n<td>1988: Wolfram|Alpha is built on the Wolfram Mathematica system, which has been in continual development since 1988<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Languages<\/td>\n<td>41<\/td>\n<td>English only<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Limitations<\/td>\n<td>authority based on PageRank, lack of common data structure<\/td>\n<td>Wolfram|Alpha can only know things that are known, and are somehow public. It only deals with facts, not opinions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Key strenghts<\/td>\n<td>Simplicity and a wide range of knowledge\/data<\/td>\n<td>computation and mathematics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Data checks<\/td>\n<td>Mainly automated and managed by Google spam team. But, given its mainstream audience highly affected by spam<\/td>\n<td>Automated and manual, including exper review.  Less likely to be targeted by spammers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Data upload<\/td>\n<td>No &#8211; data needs to be published on the web<\/td>\n<td>Yes &#8211; submission process sumilar to wikipedia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Private personal information<\/td>\n<td>Yes<\/td>\n<td>No. It contains only information that is considered public. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Adult content<\/td>\n<td>Yes, particularly when SafeSearch Filtering is off<\/td>\n<td>No. It has no adult images or narrative. It gives only factual answers to factual questions.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><br \/>\nMany similarities but they are two completely different tools &#8211; targeting different audience.  <Br><br \/>\nI think Wolfram|Alpha has its right to exist as a niche and reliable tool for research and I&#8217;m sure there are businesses who will pay for additional features. What do you think?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After reading Ericks&#8217; article and comments on how Google will crush Wolfram|Alpha I thought it would be good to summmarise the discussion as there seem to be a lot of confusion what Wolfram|Alpha is\/isn&#8217;t. See the differences in the table below and feel free to adda comment if you think I missed anything. At the <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/2009\/05\/17\/wolframalpha-vs-google-comparison\/\">[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/luke.szkudlarek.pl\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}